You must be logged in to post messages.
Please login or register

Age of Empires / Rise of Rome / Definitive Edition
Moderated by Suppiluliuma, PhatFish, Fisk, EpiC_Anonymous, Epd999

Hop to:    
loginhomeregisterhelprules
Bottom
Topic Subject: Contesting the "Grand Emperor"
posted 12-10-98 06:06 PM ET (US)   
Well, I'm sure plenty of people are aware of the annoying "18 or older" rule that applied to the Rumble for Rome contest. Well, I say that the folks going to Seattle (or wherever) are not definitely the four best players, for multiple reasons, including age. Everyone under 18 was barred from the tournament. There are plenty of skilled players who are younger than 18 that would have a chance against these four. I know it is necessary for Microsoft to have that crappy rule, but they shouldn't proclaim the winner the "best" when they haven't included everyone that wanted to play.


Replies:
posted 12-10-98 06:50 PM ET (US)     1 / 2  
legal issues..

L.


posted 12-12-98 04:21 PM ET (US)     2 / 2  
You can't posibly call any tournaments winner the best. The problem with the tournaments are in the early rounds, it was single elimination. That means any player that gets one terrible start, makes one mistake, or just plays 1 bad game early is out of it. Once you get to the finals its not as bad since its at least 2 out of 3.


Age of Empires Heaven » Forums » Age of Empires / Rise of Rome / Definitive Edition » Contesting the "Grand Emperor"
Top
You must be logged in to post messages.
Please login or register
Hop to:    
Age of Empires Heaven | HeavenGames