Well, I'm sure plenty of people are aware of the annoying "18 or older" rule that applied to the Rumble for Rome contest. Well, I say that the folks going to Seattle (or wherever) are not definitely the four best players, for multiple reasons, including age. Everyone under 18 was barred from the tournament. There are plenty of skilled players who are younger than 18 that would have a chance against these four. I know it is necessary for Microsoft to have that crappy rule, but they shouldn't proclaim the winner the "best" when they haven't included everyone that wanted to play.
posted 12-10-98 06:50 PM
1 / 2
posted 12-12-98 04:21 PM
2 / 2
You can't posibly call any tournaments winner the best. The problem with the tournaments are in the early rounds, it was single elimination. That means any player that gets one terrible start, makes one mistake, or just plays 1 bad game early is out of it. Once you get to the finals its not as bad since its at least 2 out of 3.